On Tuesday 28 June 2005 14:34, Michael Veksler wrote: > Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 28/06/2005 15:30:27: > > On Tuesday 28 June 2005 14:16, Paul Koning wrote: > > > I must be missing something. > > > > Yes. > > > > > Unsigned has wraparound (modulo) > > > semantics. > > > > The whole point is that it doesn't. > > I think that you confuse between signed and unsigned. > Signed does not have modulo semantics (in GCC. > The standard permits it to have modulo semantics).
Hmmyes. Silly me. Gr. Steven
