Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > I recon that such
| > representation needs a lowering stage, but it looks like we're doing
| > that more or less already. Do I miss something?
|
| Yes -- we don't really have a lowering stage, unless you count
| transformation to GENERIC.
Yes, I had transformation to GENERIC in mind. Were you thinking of
having another stage in addition of transformation to GENERIC? What
would be its distinctive characeteristics?
I'm not sure whether or not a separate stage makes sense. The point is
that it's a lot of work, and we don't have it yet, so RECORD_TYPEs are
going to continue be used to represent pointers-to-member functions for
some time.
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(916) 791-8304
