On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: > Understood. I'm just looking for the minimum type alignment without > user alignment. It appears that this is impossible to get from the > targets, due to the way the targets can override type alignments in > (almost completely) general ways. Is this true?
For !STRICT_ALIGNMENT, there is no interesting minimum. r~
