On 22/07/2005, at 7:57 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
There is a "semantics of access". It is implementation-defined.
I think you're thinking of "what constitutes an access", which is implementation-defined, but is not the same of the semantics of an access.
The standard describes things like side effect and such in terms of *access*.
That's true, but this actually makes the model less useful, not more. There is no requirement on the implementation that it actually perform any side effects if they are not needed.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
