On Jul 27, 2005, at 2:18 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:10:56PM -0700, Dale Johannesen wrote:
Yes, it is. The following fixes my problem, and causes a couple of
3DNow-specific regressions
in the testsuite which I need to look at, but nothing serious; I think
it's gotten far enough to post
for opinions. This is intended to go on top of Paolo's patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-07/msg01044.html
It may, of course, run afoul of inaccuracies in the patterns on
various
targets, haven't tried any performance testing yet.
Looks plausible. Let us know what you wind up with wrt those
regressions and testing.
OK, I've tested this on darwin x86 (both patches together). No
regressions.
I don't think I ought to publish absolute Spec numbers for this
machine, but
I get +1% on FP and +1/2% on Int. Wins: applu +3%, lucas +10%,
eon +3%. Losses: apsi -9%. All other changes under 2%. This looks
OK to me, though I'll be investigating apsi.
(Paolo and Richard Guenther are doing this for Linux.)
