On 8/3/05, Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is nevertheless correct. Examine all of the parts of the expression. > > In particular, "&s->b". What type does it have? In an ideal world, it > would be "pointer to unaligned integer". But we have no such type in > our type system, so it is "pointer to integer". This expression is ONLY > THEN passed to memcpy. At which point we query the argument for its > alignment, and get the non-intuitive result. > > If you instead pass "s" to memcpy, you should get the correct unaligned > copy. If that isn't happening, that's a bug.
I'm not sure I understood the last line. s is a structure, and its address is aligned. How would you pass it to memcpy, and why would it generate an unaligned copy? Cheers, Shaun
