On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 10:05:26AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > >This would conflict with my proposed changes to pex-win32.c . It seems > >like getting '#!' functioning on mingw would be a better solution than > >relying on $(LN) on mingw. > > FWIW, I'm opposed to the "#!" change to MinGW. It just seems hackish to > me, and it means that we'll pay an additional cost on all normal uses of > pex-* on MinGW, even after the compiler is installed.
Not if it's implemented after CreateProcess fails, we won't. I don't think your argument applies. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
