Ross Ridge wrote:
> Thinking semantically is irrelevent because the question isn't whether GCC
> conforms to C99 or POSIX. It clearly doesn't. GCC fails the as-if rule.
> The question is one of implementation burden, which can only be answered
> by examining GCC's implementation.
Robert Dewar wrote:
> Once again we are not discussing general conformance here, just
> conformance on this specific issue.
Wrong. The question that was asked and I answered was about
implementation burden, not conformance.
Ross Ridge
--
l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
[oo][oo] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca/u/rridge/
db //
