Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Do you suppose the idiom is common enough that VRP could special-case >>> "arrays of size 1 at the end of a struct" ? And still obtain the benefits >>> of the optimisation in 99.99% of all non-variable-length-tail-array cases? >> >> It makes sense to me. We could special case "arrays of size 1 at the end of >> the struct", and treat it as C99 flexible array members. Any other case >> could simply be considered broken. > > broken with respect to what?
broken as in undefined behaviour? We would still be doing the right thing in the common case that people use, and optimize all the others. -- Giovanni Bajo
