On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 07:15:11PM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Jeffrey A Law wrote: > >On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 17:50 +0100, Giovanni Bajo wrote: > > > >>Why not putting it on a branch? If you are going to finish and submit it > >>for > >>4.1, it might be easier to use CVS. > > > >It might also be easier for those of us who want to play with the code, > >without having to find a suitable sync point between the patch and > >mainline sources. > > I have created a new branch, "reload-branch", on which I'm going to > check in these changes. Once I've done that, I'll commit the patch > below to mention the branch in the documentation.
Hey Bernd, Has there been any news or progress on reload-branch lately? It removes a lot of code that I'd dearly love to see gone... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC
