On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:32:50AM -0700, Kean Johnston wrote: > >Why doesn't it thrill you? > I think svn is a great tool, don't get me wrong. Very well > written and got all the features one could want. But I > don't know (or see) the actual problem you are trying to > solve. cvs seems to be wroking really well for gcc. The > weaknesses of cvs, such as the pain of renaming and > moving directories, isn't really an issue for that codebase > (at least not very often).
Hi Kean, Rather than starting up this discussion on gcc@ again, could you please go read the list archives? I feel like you've missed a couple of years of context here, including the last few times we discussed why a switch was in order. CVS is not working well for GCC at all. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC