> On May 21, 2024, at 9:57 AM, Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/21/24 12:05 AM, Richard Biener via Gcc wrote:
>> On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 4:45 PM Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 5 Jul 2023, Joern Rennecke wrote:
>>>> I haven't worked with these targets in years and can't really do
>>>> sensible maintenance or reviews of patches for them. I am currently
>>>> working on optimizations for other ports like RISC-V.
>>>
>>> I noticed MAINTAINERS was not updated, so pushed the patch below.
>> That leaves the epiphany port unmaintained. Should we automatically add such
>> ports to the list of obsoleted ports?
> Given that epiphany has randomly failed tests for the last 3+ years due to
> bugs in its patterns, yes, it really needs to be deprecated.
>
> I tried to fix the worst of the offenders in epiphany.md a few years back and
> gave up. Essentially seemingly innocent changes in the RTL will cause reload
> to occasionally not see a path to get constraints satisfied. So a test which
> passes today, will flip to failing tomorrow while some other test of tests
> will go the other way.
Does LRA make that issue go away, or does it not help?
paul
