[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Costa) wrote on 13.10.05 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 13 Oct 2005, at 7:41 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >> yeah, if it were in one of those books it could be added to the -
> >> weff-c+
> >> + option. It doesn't seem sensible to add a different option for an
> >> alternative (set of?) coding rule(s).
> >>
> >
> > FYI this is item 13 in MEC++.
> >
>
> It is on just about any decent modern C++ coding guide/list somewhere.
>
> > I think this would be a good error to have. My suggestion is to
> > file an
> > enhancement request in gcc bugzilla, with this code:
> >
> > #include <stdexcept>
> >
> > void
> > foo()
> > {
> > try
> > {
> > }
> > catch (std::logic_error e)
> > {
> > }
> > }
So what you say is that any decent modern C++ coding guide/list wants to
forbid catching the C++ standard exceptions, and anything derived from
them?
How on earth can that count as "decent"?!
MfG Kai
