Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Uhm, I'm not sure how to explain this without being too pedantic. >> Does this >> sound clearer? > > This tool tracks each individual change (fine-grained) and will never > reapply an already applied change. > > I think that is a high level answer, and completely answers the > question to people that have the question, while doing as little as > possible to confuse someone that doesn't even have the question. > Anyone doing merges should have the question and understand the > answer. > > Or, you can say it merges in N-1 to N, when one requests a merge of > N. A totally different way of expressing the same thing, and conveys > the same information. > > Sound reasonable?
Thanks for the suggestion, I have incorporated this into the Wiki page, I hope it's clearer now. Giovanni Bajo
