On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, FX Coudert wrote: > PS: I'm amazed that a "GNU project" can have exactly two developers, > release source snapshots every two years, adopt the too common attitude > of "every non-i686-linux platform is not mainstream", and so on.
There is a difference in focus between the Free Software and Open Source movements. GCC itselfs used to be an example with a closed development process, back in the 90s. On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Richard Guenther wrote: > If it's really compiler problems, this is one more reason for pulling > gmp to the toplevel gcc, so it can be built with a sane compiler. Indeed. Gerald
