I see that this patch has already been submitted and accepted, so I'll just basically state my agreement.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 11:28:06PM +0100, Paul Thomas wrote: > For what it is worth, I applaud your effort - I think that the gfortran > middle-end should be made completely consistent with the rest of gcc. I agree. > A nagging > worry that I have is that the gcc middle-end is still not very well > documented. Well, it's not like gfortran is any better documented. At least with gcc middle-end, there is a much larger amount of people familiar with it who can concievably help. > That said, I would get on > with it if I were you. Again, agreed. Perhaps we can lure Richard into becoming a gfortran developer before he notices it. ;-) -- Janne Blomqvist
pgpl5hIAKKS5u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
