Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> What about bubblestrap? >> >> (See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25438) >> >> > A "make" from a toplevel is equivalent to the old "make bubblestrap" > or "make -C bubblestrap". In practice "make" just does the right > thing, compiling all that is needed to not have comparison failures.
I would also note that using "make" in the cp/ directory at least used to build cc1plus with the system compiler, without -Werror and with a different set of warnings. There have been many cases where a patch tested by C++ rules (which is *not* a full bootstrap, but just "build compiler, build libjava, check c++") resulted in a bootstrap failure because of a variable not initialized or something. The correct solution used to be (guess what!) "make bubblestrap" to build the compiler. Now, it's simply the default :) Giovanni Bajo