> - powerpc-darwin doesn't bootstrap => PR 22533, regression from 4.0), > Richard, Eric, Andrew, do you have a status for powerpc-darwin on 4.1?
PR 22533 is presumably fixed now. powerpc-darwin may or may not bootstrap Ada, but it looks like a target problem if it doesn't. > - three ACATS wrong-code on amd64-linux => PR 20548, regression from 4.0 > but it looks like we were lucky before so might not count as a > regression. Not quite, these are regressions from 4.0 in the sense that they were robustly passing with 4.0 but don't pass anymore with 4.1 because of changes in the way the compiler detects stack overflows. They now need to be compiled with -fstack-check to pass on 64-bit platforms; but they would actually not pass even with -fstack-check, because -fstack-check doesn't really work in 4.x. We plan to contribute a new implementation of -fstack-check in the future. > Note this one affects some other platforms too and some > don't see those FAIL at all on amd64: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00834.html Yes, the testsuite is clean on my AMD64 box too. I guess it depends on the kernel and SuSE kernels play nice here. > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00635.html > sparc-linux is in good shape. SPARC/Solaris too: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00504.html SPARC is still the only platform where ce3810b fails, but the problem is generic and has long been latent in the runtime. Thanks for all your Ada-related work! -- Eric Botcazou