On Friday 20 January 2006 18:34, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Friday 20 January 2006 18:21, Mark Mitchell wrote: > > Richard Guenther wrote: > > > A patch was also posted based on ideas in the audit trail. It's third > > > incarnation at > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg00967.html > > > would need a review.
FWIW, I don't believe this is a "fix", but rather a solid work-around for the problem. I'm still trusting rth's superior compiler brain and GCC knowledge to ultimately be ingredients in a real fix ;-) Gr. Steven
