Ryan Mansfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > and that paper was debunked when it was presented at the ISO C++ | > committee in April 2003 at Oxford, UK. EDG is very willing to give | > advice (based on their experience) to anyone interested in | > implementing export in, say GCC. (They want to see the best | > implementation of export for C++.) | > | > -- Gaby | | Well, my point was that Herb Sutter had just written a paper on it, and it | was the EDG guys who had done the implementation. Even though Sutter's paper | was debunked, do EDG no longer stand behind their 2.5-3yr estimate?
You'd have to ask them. That paper has done more harm than any good. -- Gaby
