On 2/21/06, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 21, 2006, at 4:44 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > Is this the intended layout of this structure? What does it mean when > > a field runs off the end of the structure? In this case, should I > > just ignore the type size and assume that the 8 bytes are dynamically > > there? > > I wonder if this is the same problem as recorded as PR 22488. To me it > does sound > like the same issue.
Which should remind the C++ folks that they promised to fix this for 4.2 :P Richard.
