Danny Smith wrote: > In my experience, following test is not necessary. Win9x just ignores > the CREATE_NO_WINDOWS flag so setting it is a harmless no-op on these > platforms.
It's OK with me not to do it; I just didn't have those platforms to use for testing, and it seems more pedantically correct to check the version. But, I'm sure not going to argue for keeping that block of code in there if that stands in the way of making progress! > See also > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2003-q4/msg00260.html Lovely, we're all reinventing the same wheels. All the more reason to get this into libiberty... :-) Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
