On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 12:30:33PM -0400, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > I think that the warning is useful if the comparison is *always* true for > > any call of foo<anything>. But here, whether the test is redundant or not > > depends on the type of bar. Possibly there's a way to determine that the > > type of bar is a template argument and suppress the warning in that case. > > Why are we talking so much in this thread and not fixing the bug?
Because there is a question about what the correct fix is.
