Andrew Pinski wrote: >> After the LTO proposal (http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/lto/lto.pdf) was >> posted, a fruitful discussion ensued. One of the key topics that arose >> was the the possibility of using LLVM instead of the TREE-SSA >> optimizers. Things have quieted down on the public lists since then, >> but the need for link-time optimization hasn't gone away -- so it's time >> to get moving! >> >> We've now created branches/lto in the GCC repository to start doing LTO >> work, beginning with: > > Can you also update svn.html?
Done, thanks. -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
