-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Brian Dessent wrote: > Ranjit Mathew wrote: > >> I just noticed that even with "--disable-static --enable-static", > > Do you mean --disable-static --enable-shared?
Yes, sorry for the silly typo. >> a Linux-to-MinGW cross compiler (mainline) still created static >> libraries for the C++ and Java runtimes. Is this by design or is it >> a bug? From the point of view of creating executables for embedded > > As far as I know, shared libstdc++ for mingw/cygwin has never worked, > you always get static no matter what you do, regardless of > --enable-shared or native/cross. I don't know if this is because of the > archaic version of libtool that's in the tree, or some other reason. It > sure would be nice to get a shared libstdc++ one of these days without > having to resort to hacks like manually linking together all the .o > files in the build tree. I had forgotten about libtool's limitations w.r.t. shared libaries for Windows that TJ Laurenzo had already hit while trying to create a shared libgcj for Windows: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2005-09/msg00009.html Thanks, Ranjit. - -- Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT gmail DOT com Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://rmathew.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEj6UJYb1hx2wRS48RAoXyAJ4uTzoPrm+1Ov0h/JHBnPBi3QFezQCfRjxo utyPNuPlYio/vkAn6XvVDNU= =o8Xf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
