Atsushi Nemoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 19 Jun 2006 16:45:43 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I tried recreating this, but I couldn't. I get this: > ... > > This of course is not ideal, since it unconditionally executes the > > rdhwr instruction. But it is not the same as what the OP reported. > > I used stock gcc 4.1.1 to get the result: mips-linux-gcc -O2 -S foo.c
I was using current mainline. > Should I file a bug report? Yes, please. Thanks. Ian
