Shaun Jackman writes: > Hello Richard, Dan, > > I'm trying to track down which part of the GCC source tree makes the > decision to emit either a R_ARM_GOT32 or a R_ARM_GOTOFF32 relocation. > A new feature in GCC 4.1 emits a R_ARM_GOTOFF32 relocation for a > reference to a static function. I thought there was a good chance one > of you two might have added this feature. If you're familiar with the > the patch, would you please point me to the relevant ChangeLog entry? > I'm hoping to add an exception for execute in place (XIP) code (-fPIC > -msingle-pic-base) to use R_ARM_GOT32 instead of R_ARM_GOTOFF32. > > Many thanks, > Shaun > > See also http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28194
Use "svn blame" Andrew.
