Pat Haugen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/21/2006 01:22:25 PM:
> Jan Hubicka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 08/19/2006 07:51:42 PM: > > > Hi, > > this patch at least hides the ugly details within some abstraction so we > > can eventally go for propagating reliability information across CFG if > > we conclude it is important. How does it work for you? > > > > I like your approach, thanks. I've confirmed that the generated code no > longer contains the mis-predicted branch hints. Will follow up with > results from SPEC run once I get them (hosed things up for myself, so > restarting from scratch) :-( > > -Pat > The results with your patch mimicked the results of my initial attempt: perlbmk improved 7% and a couple others improved a couple percent. -Pat
