On Fri, Sep 01, 2006 at 09:45:34AM -0400, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > Given that Mark, and for that matter no one else, did not really push > back, I am pretty much committed not to use dwarf.
Then... what are you going to do about things like types? Invent a new serialization for those too? I think that confusing dwarf-for-types and dwarf-for-gimple would be a mistake. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery
