[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Shinwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My port, based on (GCC) 4.2.0 20061002 (experimental), is producing
incorrect code for the following test case:
[snip]
I've only had a very quick look at your code, but I have a feeling
thatthis is an instance of the kind of slip-up with
GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESSthat my patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00858.html is
aimed at preventing. (This patch is currently only applied to
addrmodesbranch.)
Mark
Hhmm. Is the intent of your patch simply to prevent the mistake of
backends not defining GO_IF_MODE_DEPENDENT_ADDRESS properly?
That's right. Presumably something else is wrong, then :-)
Mark
