Richard Kenner wrote:
which clearly says LIA-1 isn't a requirement - notice "if" in the
second setence.
H.1 makes it clear that the entire Annex H doesn't add any extra rule
to the language but merely describes what C is in regard to LIA-1.
H.2 doubly makes it clear that C as it defined isn't LIA-1
- again, notice "if" in H.2p1.
That's the way I read it too. Indeed, perhaps -fwrapv really ought to
be called -flia-1?
Is a smiley missing here?
If not, this is seriously confused, lia-1 is MUCH more than just
wrapping integer types.
