Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Kenner) writes:
| 
| > I found my copy of K&R (Second Edition)....
| 
| Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| 
| > so in fact the new C standard has changed
| > nothing from a definitional point of view,
| 
| Wait, though: K&Rv2 is post-C89.  If memory serves, it was C89
| that established the rule that signed integer overflow has
| undefined behavior whereas unsigned overflow is well-defined.

My memory is that signed integer arithmetic overflow is undefined by
K&R C; unfortunately, my copy of the '77 edition of K&R is at office,
thousands of miles away from where I'm.

-- Gaby

Reply via email to