Paul Brook wrote: > On Wednesday 31 January 2007 01:26, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> Robert Schwebel wrote: >>> What about PR28516, would it be acceptable for 4.1.2? >> There are two issues: >> >> (1) it's not marked as a 4.1 regression, let alone a regression from >> 4.1.x. Did this test case work with older versions of GCC? > > 4.1 is the first FSF release to support arm-linux-gnueabi (the bug only > effects eabi targets). The bug is preset in 4.0, but apparently noone other > than glibc uses nested functions with -fexceptions.
OK; in that case, I don't think this qualifies as a regression from a previous 4.1.x release. But, I'd certainly consider it within the discretion of the ARM maintainers to put this patch on the 4.1 branch after 4.1.2 is out, as it's a simple ARM-only patch. That assumes, of course, that everyone agrees about the GAS issue. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
