On 2/13/07, Vladimir Makarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is it unacceptable for it to mature further on mainline like >Tree-SSA? > > Two releases one after another to avoid. No one real experiment to try to rewrite an RTL optimization to figure out how def-use chain will work.
Vlad, this FUD-spreading is beginning to annoy me. Please get your view of the facts in order. There *are* passes rewritten in the new framework to figure out how this will work. In fact, some of those passes existed even before the rest of the backend was converted to the new dataflow scheme. Existing on trunk even now: fwprop, see, web, loop-iv. New on the branch: at least auto-inc-dec. Gr. Steven
