Tobias Pflug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This will compile just fine. When compiled with -Wall it will at least > bring up a warning about the missing return statement in foo(), nothing > about main tho either. Or is there some standard that implicitly declares > main to return 0 when there is no explicit return statement?
If the return value of a function is never used then it is perfectly valid to fall through the end of it. For main, the default action is to return 0 since C99. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
