On 02/03/07, Brooks Moses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
> On 02/03/07, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> A week is too short of time to ping a patch.
>
> Ups! I actually believed that a week was the recommended time to ping
> a patch. What is it then?
I remembered a week as well, but http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html says
two weeks.
I agree with Joe that you can't always expect an answer within a week,
but I don't think that necessarily means that pinging after a week or so
is a bad thing; it just means that patches are likely to get pinged
sometimes. It seems to me that pings work reasonably well in practice
to deal with the "someone else should review this" problem.
That is what I think. Although I am going to change my frequency to
two weeks from now on to comply with contribute.html
Thanks for the info.
Manuel.
