"Joseph S. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We should use current CVS HEAD libtool. We definitely can't use 1.5 > releases without *a lot* of auditing of local changes: we've allowed local > changes into GCC's libtool on the basis that there are equivalents in CVS > HEAD (this is the policy in codingconventions.html), to use 1.5 while > avoiding regressions would require auditing every local change since > libtool 1.5 branched to see if it's in 1.5.22.
>From what I can see almost all of the local changes in GCC are from before the 1.5 branch was created. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."