On Mar 13, 2007, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It treats only "/opt" as a common component of the two paths, rathe > than "/opt/foo". If you use "/opt/foo/" (instead of "/opt/foo") for > the last argument, the answer is as I expected. This seems odd to me; > is it the intended behavior?
IIRC this is intended behavior, to enable stuff such as "/some/dir-suffix" and "/another/different-suffix" to generate the correct relative pathnames, when given "/some/dir" as prefix. -- Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ FSF Latin America Board Member http://www.fsfla.org/ Red Hat Compiler Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc.gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist [EMAIL PROTECTED], gnu.org}
