> > I think (if I'm correctly interpreting the list in passes.c) it is. > It's > > right after pass_warn_function_noreturn, just before pass_mudflap_2. > Is > > this right? I don't get any assertion about SSA not being available. > > In this case, it is also after pass_del_ssa, which means SSA has > already > been destroyed.
Oh, ok. Thanks! I had assumed the mudflap passes would have SSA enabled as the 'Tree-SSA passes' section of the GCC internal manual listed them: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Tree_002dSSA-passes.html#Tree_002dSSA-p asses. Thanks. Alex.
