Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| * Manuel López-Ibáñez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-27 13:13]:
| > So if you are seeing this in C++, the change was intentional because
| > PR24924 was fixed. If you are seeing it in C and you are not using
| > pedantic-errors, then it is probably a bug.
| 
| Thanks for the explanation - this explains what I'm seeing.  Is there
| a good reason against changing this particular warning from
| CPP_DL_PEDWARN to CPP_DL_WARNING?  Quite a few packages in Debian fail
| to build because of this and it seems overly strict to me.  However, if
| it'll remain an error with C++ code, I'll start filing bugs on these
| packages.

-pedantic asks for strict checking of rules.  User should accept
correcting their codes (or used codes) with they ask for strict checking.

-- Gaby

Reply via email to