On 4/9/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Evening all, just a quick question: [ ref: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31513, " [4.2/4.3 Regression] Miscompilation of Function Passing Bit Field Value to Function" ] Should promotion of function arguments be explicitly represented in GIMPLE, or should it be performed when generating the corresponding RTL? It doesn't appear to be taking place correctly for the <unnamed type>s used to represent bitfields.
There is a conversion missing on the tree level. See also PR31136. Richard.