>>>>> "Ross" == Ross Ridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ross> So long as whatever switch is used to enable this check isn't on by Ross> default and its effect on code size and speed is documented, I don't Ross> think it matters that much what those effects are. Anything that works Ross> should make the people concerned about security happy. People more Ross> concerned with size or speed aren't going to enable this feature. I think it would be preferable to default to being safe, and let people who are concerned about shaving every byte or cycle disable the check. I suppose I think this because I have a preference for safety, and also because I suspect that the cost of this will be small. Naturally the latter should be measured first. Tom
