Richard Guenther wrote: >> > Another problem is that --enable-checking hasn't been set to 'release', >> > so the stage1 binary is too big to run on my ARM systems (and the >> > compiler will be unnecessarily slower than it needs to be).
>> Are you sure that we're not building with release-checking only? > > stage1 is always built with checking enabled. OK. There's a good chance that both Richard E. and I didn't realize that (it didn't use to be true). So, from what you're saying, there doesn't seem to be an evidence that this is a real problem. Do we build stage1 with checking enabled even if --disable-checking is in effect? Otherwise, how to do folks like Richard E. that are running natively on small systems work around this issue? Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
