On Wed, May 16, 2007 at 12:02:57AM +0200, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > 2007/5/15, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ explanation of why gprof is as it is ] > It's not well reasoned.
If you don't like my explanation, feel free to rewrite the software; it is free software after all. This list usually responds even to good ideas with "patches welcome", meaning that it is up to the proposer to do the work. I'm not going to engage you in further discussion.
