Michael Meissner wrote: > On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 01:27:39PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: >> Joseph S. Myers wrote: >>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: >>> >>>> I am aware of three remaining projects which are or might be appropriate >>>> for Stage 1: >>> Do we at this point believe that the people who were working on updating >>> the TYPE_ARG_TYPES changes (from the old LTO branch) for trunk are not now >>> going to have them ready in time?
> Unfortunately that person has left AMD. Evidently he and I had some > miscommunication, becuase I thought those patches had been checked in before > he > left. I have been told by my management to either resurrect the patches, or > create new patches to fix the backends. Can you remind me what changes need > to > be made? Sorry about this confusion. Thanks for following up. The goal here is to merge the patches on the (old) LTO branch which change the representation of TYPE_ARG_TYPES. At present, that is a TREE_LIST; on the LTO branch, this representation was changed so that it was instead a TREE_VEC, which saves memory and makes accesses more efficient. The work remaining was to get these patches working with all of the various back ends. Some of them directly manipulate FUNCTION_TYPEs, and so need changes. If you would be willing to work on that, that would be terrific! Please let Kazu Hirta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or myself know if you need help. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
