OTOH, if we start to produce NaN for sqrt(0.0) that is of course simply 'wrong', not inaccurate ;)
I still support the introduction of a special switch for this kind of transformation, -fwrong-math-optimizations. :-)
Paolo
OTOH, if we start to produce NaN for sqrt(0.0) that is of course simply 'wrong', not inaccurate ;)
I still support the introduction of a special switch for this kind of transformation, -fwrong-math-optimizations. :-)
Paolo