Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 10:04 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
>>> I suspect that the realview compiler accepts
>>> this as an oversight or a bug, not as an intentional feature.
>> Let's ask.
>>
>> Richard E., is the fact that RealView 3.0SP1 accepts:
>>
>> class __declspec(notshared) S {
>> __declspec(dllimport) void f();
>> };
>>
>> a bug or a feature? If this is considered a bug, is it something that
>> RealView is likely to change in a future release, or will it be
>> preserved for the forseeable future for backwards compatibility?
>
> This is well beyond my sphere of expertise, so I've asked one of the
> original developers of the spec. He asserts that the above is supported
> and intentional. Hopefully I've correctly represented his position
> below.
Thank you for following up on this!
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(650) 331-3385 x713
