Maxim Kuvyrkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Option '2' looks more favorable to me, though implies greater initial
> effort of simplifying complex machine description without loosing precious
> bits of fine tuning.  Following this path define_split will be my best
> friend and helper.

I agree with that.  The m68k machine description really would need a
major overhaul to bring it up to modern standards.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."

Reply via email to