Mark Shinwell wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Mark Shinwell wrote:
Do you think it should be the case that, at the point below, _any_
reload
with reg_rtx corresponding to a hard register should have the relevant
bit set in reload_spill_index?
I think so. I'm attaching a patch below. It appears to have no effect
on all code I've tried - does it fix your test case?
As noted before, this does fix the test case; I've now regtested it
on arm-none-eabi and there are no regressions. Do you want to take
care of applying it?
Thanks for testing. I bootstrapped and regression tested it on
i686-linux and committed it as 126415. I'll put it on the 4.2 and 4.1
branches in a week or so.
Bernd
--
This footer brought to you by insane German lawmakers.
Analog Devices GmbH Wilhelm-Wagenfeld-Str. 6 80807 Muenchen
Sitz der Gesellschaft Muenchen, Registergericht Muenchen HRB 40368
Geschaeftsfuehrer Thomas Wessel, William A. Martin, Margaret Seif
