Jan Hubicka wrote: > One thing I would like to see in is the sharing checker. The criteria > of bootstrap/regtesting on primary platforms is almost met now with > exception of regmove pass that I sent patch for some time ago. > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-12/msg01441.html > I will do re-testing now and see if some new problems has appeared.
Thank you for bringing this up. I'd let to get the checker in too. But, I don't really understand the regrename.c patch. Are you saying that regrename.c is broken, and that we need to make these copies because of a real bug? Or just to make the checker happy? If the latter, have you measured the compile-time and memory usage to see what impact that has? We'd like to avoid making the compiler slower just to make the checker happy -- but, of course, it might be worth a small hit to get the checking benefit. Thanks, -- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery [EMAIL PROTECTED] (650) 331-3385 x713
